"...Student learning outcomes: Glass can be used in situations where it is difficult to observe student behavior. For example, problem based learning and active learning (flipped) classrooms often require students to work in teams. Given the number of teams working simultaneously in large classroom settings it is difficult to observe each one long enough to see the arc of their interaction. Students working in groups can wear and use Glass to record what has been going on for self-evaluation and instructor review. In another example, students can use Glass to do field work that is later shared with the class for dissection, discussion, and shared learning."
"...On a chilly morning in early January, I joined a hundred students in a lecture hall on the Georgia Tech campus for a class called Mobile and Ubiquitous Computing. The professor, Thad Starner, looked up at his audience of aspiring programmers, industrial designers, roboticists, and user-interface specialists. He is forty-four, with a boyish face and sideburns that yearn for the 1990s. He wore, as he often does, a black T-shirt and black jeans. “In this class we’re going to talk about four main things,” he said. “Privacy, power and heat, networking on- and off-body, and interface. Every time you make any decision on any four of these dimensions, it’s going to affect the others. It’s always a balancing act.”
Yesterday, Dr Albrecht appeared on George Noury's Coast to Coast program (see technology update here) and discussed the 'I want my iPad' phenomenon in toddlers. Here is another video she pointed to:
And another... She maintained that she would generally NOT wish for listeners to view these kinds of clips online but in this instance, it was the only way to raise awareness to an epidemic occurring in our society.
This phenomenon is a known phenomenon. See more. So what are we doing about it? Gathering the evidence and putting our kids online so that our Youtube hits increase ten-thousand fold?
I feel so sick in linking these videos of these kids up online in the uberveillance.com environment. But I am calling people out there to wake up to the what is occurring in most of our households.
What is the answer?
Better friends and extended support groups?
Zero tolerance on screen time for toddlers?
Schools saying 'no' to technology in the classroom?
Are we adding fuel to the fire?
What is blatantly obvious to me is that we need more research into SOLUTIONS. We can't have kids crying like this and profusely suffering anguish, and we cannot have parents surviving this kind of daily misery... and most of all we need to feedback these problems to developers... we cannot point the finger at Apple or Google alone... we need to point the finger at ourselves... society... yes 'we' perpetuate the problem. We can plead ignorance but we all know someone going through this- a child, a grandchild, a niece or nephew, a friend or a neighbour... in fact, we might be even going through it ourselves!
Where have we gone wrong?
Beyond that obvious point?
Why are the parents of these poor children putting their kids up online for everyone to comment on? Are they deep down seeking help? Do they want their prayers answered? Do they want to make their kids well?
We cannot claim ALL of these children appearing in thousands of uploads (just search online) are due to autism or some other mental illness or developmental problems! And if we claim that, are computers somehow contributing to these developmental issues?
The other thing that becomes apparent to me is the use of the mobile phone video camera as a weapon. Have we become so heartless, that we begin now to film these traumatic events and post them online for others to comment on. You were right on the mark Dr Albrecht. This is evil. Instead of going over and gently comforting our kids to return to their senses, we take out the camera to record the reality-tv... and so our children are now a part of a global theatre!
In previous posts, I have discussed the importance of NOT capturing these moments so we can allow our children to grow and develop, and not be held accountable for things they did as children. MG Michael and I have discussed the limits of watching. With Christine Perakslis we have also written an extensive book chapter on veillance (in press)!
Can you imagine being one of the kids in this video? How would that make you feel 5 years on, 10 years on, 20 years on, or when you first discovered it was online for all to see on Youtube? Would you be typecast for life?
Everyone, we have to wake up! I am not being alarmist... if your heart doesn't feel sad over these videos then I personally don't know what to say...
And then we are contemplating taking Glass into the classroom? Right-o! Don't you think these tantrums don't happen at school? Will our children become "objects" not just "subjects" in the classroom? Let us tread VERY carefully. We can't use our kids as experiments. We need to think ethics.
And it is not just children that react this way... no... no... adults too, have this reaction but just convey it in a different way. See my article on high-tech lust!
We need to take the negative social implications of computers more seriously. Yes, some guys out there claim that computers can help kids... all my fellow collaborators and I are claiming is that the opposite is also true. Let's not be so narrowsighted. This is our future we are talking about!
[ image: cultofmac ]
"...However, having worked in educational IT (with both public and private schools), I have to say that the idea of launching BYOD at the K-12 level makes me shudder. There are several serious concerns that should be forefront in the minds of school IT staff, administrators, teachers, and parents about BYOD in schools. Here are some of the big ones."
More from Lifehacker
I have always been interested in Stephen Downes and not just for his avid feed list but for the way in which he manages to capture things which really define where we are heading....especially when we consider where we are headed as humans, as Educators and as thinking / feeling / being people.
Here is a great article which I intend including in my literature Review for the PhD.
I often wonder what Stephen's take would be on Uberveillance ?
Learning by being (a photoborg) is a step beyond learning by doing.
Here is evidence from the late 1990s of Steve Mann's existential learning classes- see in particular his course on computer-mediated reality. No doubt these students will have graduated from the University of Toronto with an indepth understanding of engineering and ethics principles.
A key reference on existential education can be found here: Steve Mann, "Existential Education ", Communications of the ACM , Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 33-36, 2000.
Dr Dave Hunter of Engineering Technology in the College of Business and Technology at Western Illinois University used Michael and Michael's (2009) reference book titled: "Innovative Automatic Identification and Location-Based Services: from bar codes to chip implants" in Fall 2009 as the main textbook for MET487. The course on auto-ID included different methods of identifying objects automatically and the transmission of that data throughout a facility. Topics included: bar coding, magnetic stripe, radio frequency, data communications, EDI, and systems integration. The subject outline provided additional topics including bar code symbologies, smart cards, biometrics, geographic location systems, wearable computing, the socio-ethical implications of auto-ID, and a final lecture on "Uberveillance."
Dr Armin Krishnan has discussed the notion of the uberveillance society in his INTELLIGENCE course INSS 5380 titled, "Selected Problems In Intelligence: Technical Intelligence – History And Transformation" at the University of Texas at El Paso. On the 4th of May 2011, Dr Krishnan will deliver a lecture on "Domestic Spying: the Uberveillance Society" in which he will discuss aspects of CCTV, RFID, biometrics and ANPR. Students have an opportunity to think critically by addressing an optional essay question in the course as follows:
"To what extent can increasing technological capabilities for domestic spying actually deliver improved security for a society? Why is the attempt of creating an ‘uberveillance society’ deeply problematic?"