I talked about a future like this at the QSymposium this year and many of the international relations scholars looked at me like I was from another planet! It took about 48 hours for people to realise that what I was saying was not just the stuff of science fiction, though I admit to watching every episode of Dr Who by the time I was 10 years old. I graduated with a Masters of Transnational Crime Prevention in the Faculty of Law in 2009- this is exactly what I studied, especially with respect to the notion of "hot pursuit" and separately intelligence-led policing (although now it's a lot more fashionable to talk about evidence-based policing. See my panel chairing at this Human Rights and Policing conference. A small part of my own presentation on proactive criminalisation is here.
Is this the future we want?
Is it just me, or can't you see where we're headed with this stuff?
I'd like to think that the data being collected by this BOT was going to be used just for peace and security but that would be a pipedream!
C'mon people "startup of the year"? Do we give prizes for novelty and innovation without thinking what it all might mean in the future?
And please don't give me the rhetoric about a knife being used to butter bread or to kill someone... this ain't the same thing! This is abhorrent!
One day autonomous data collection, the next a packed mule! Anyone remember this article? But then the way these things are marketed you'd think they weren't real! Well think again... I had the great pleasure of entering Boston Dynamics in June of this year and was greeted by the monstrosities at the front door. The packed mules DO exist, they just haven't been unleashed en mass!
Thanks for the link KMA- interesting these Knightscope guys were given airtime at PII this year. Correct me if I'm wrong- but aren't these the guys PII is raising awareness against? What a smokescreen confusing mess!
Darlek: "I was made to take orders..."
Dr Who: "What does that mean?"
Darlek: "I am a solider, I was made to receive orders."
Katina: "My point exactly."
Now compare to the narrative clip.
“We are going to have a lot of fun around the information management aspects of body worn video – let alone the more prosaic problem of how am I going to get this stuff from the field to a central repository with as few moving parts as possible."
Read more: http://www.itnews.com.au/News/387109,nsw-police-cio-prepares-for-copper-cam-data-deluge.aspx#ixzz33S4pamm6
"...I wouldn't be surprised if somewhere down the line this [ Google Glass ] will be the norm....or whatever the mobile technology is." - 2 April 2014 9:24AM AEST
Mitch Jackson provides an account of how he perceives Google Glass playing out across the legal profession in his state and perhaps across the United States more broadly. Mitch also provides feedback on a range of far ranging questions that included:
1. Mitch, which part of the US do you call home?
2. In your email signature you identify as a trial lawyer with 28 years experience. How is it then that you have identified as a #glassexplorer and what does that do for your credibility as a Lawyer?
3. There have been some very public events of late that expose both the good and the bad sides of #glass - what do you consider is the difference?
4. Have you or do you envisage in the the near future dealing with cases that involve #glass legally in any way?
5. Where dont you wear #glass ?
6. What has your Family reaction been to #glass ? Rotary ? your sports associations?
7. When you say your involved with social media and #googleglass in your G+ profile do you see these as separate entities or mutually complementary?
8. #glass is at this point still a relatively unknown phenomena here in Australasia. What do you consider will be the impact of #glass more broadly on the professional communities across Australia?
9. Given that society has changed significantly since the inception of the Internet do you have any ideas on what likely changes might happen with the functions and form of #googleglass in the next iterations before it's public release?
10. What is the likely shifts in law and governance that we are going to have to tackle as a Society and internationally or even perhaps across all of humanity as a result of #glass ?
WARNING: This 'film' is deeply disturbing
Abbot Lutz did not require sophisticated technology to execute his voyeurism on his child Marina...
I believe the proliferation of camera technology, beyond smartphones, will be (is) highly problematic for our society.
Sure, most people are decent... but some aren't.
Don't tell me the law will deal with ALL of the indecent.
Too much data, too many recordings... police resources will be overwhelmed!
"Someone took dozens of pictures and video of me..." |
"But did they steal anything?" |
OKay... I know, I know... crimes against the person... I've taught cybercrime before in the Faculty of Law @ UOW... and yes... there are cyberstalking laws in some jurisdictions, and child pornography laws in others, voyeurism laws and the like... yadda yadda yadda...
Hands free recordings through wearable cameras will be the reason for numerous new crimes of a heinous nature, never before experienced, witnessed, and onsold...
There now... I go on record as saying it, categorically.
One thing that has dawned on me as a result of watching this film. Lifelogging oneself has very different implications and consequences to lifelogging another. I can take 1,000 selfie photos but that is a different proposition to someone else taking 1,000 photos of me. In the same way, if I continuously take my own physiological measures and apply them to myself, it is very different to taking someone else's measures and keeping them for further analysis.
Lifelogging someone else impinges on their human dignity, and doing it exceedingly is a form of abuse.